|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
![]() |
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
![]() |
|
||||
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Welcome to The Buffalo Readings Homepage | Monday, September 06 2010 @ 09:21 AM MST |
|
Stephen Colbert is a national hero.
Authored by:
kingotho on
Saturday, May 06 2006 @ 01:30 PM MST
I guaranty you the Bush people who hired him to host the dinner, had
no idea he would say what he said. He brought up nearly every issue the Bush administration would like not brought up. Colbert's whole shtick is that he acts right wing conservative, to the extreme, and at the risk of 'explaining' the joke, he's not really right wing conservative. It's the old shakespearean adage of criticism being spoken in jest, yet in this example, the criticism is big, the jest is small, and the president is sitting right next to him. Sure he was hired to do this, but no Bush official would have 'approved' what he said. I wonder what they were thinking when they hired him? Did they really get his act? Did they know anything about him? Sure, speakers at this dinner usually do make jokes about the administration, Bush spoke with a double standing next to him, making fun of how poorly he talks, but that's not the same as challenging this president on nearly every sensitive issue of the last six years. Challenging his intelligence and decision making ability directly. VALARIE PLAME for cristsakes! It's much more ballsy than you've given him credit for, and the only reason he wasn't interrupted is because this is the one situation where to have him taken off stage in front of the entire press industry would have immediatly signaled that Bush's presidency is hoplessly crooked, anti-constitutional, and guilty of violating Colbert's first ammendment rights. Watch it again. Colbert is nervous up there, and for good reason. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes there are those who are against the present Bush's strategies- and in no way am I defending him, but in all fairness, Mr. Colbert spoke uninterrupted and gathered groans and chuckles. If you think he was being bold I would ask you to think again.
Most likely the situation is that Colbert was asked to speak as his job of being a comedian. His "speech" is more of a routine and I'll even bet that he was paid for it as well.
Dude's just doing his job, I'm not mad at him for it, but national hero? Get real.